SQL Quest › SQL Interview Questions › NULL Handling
Fare Imputation Analysis
Analyse Titanic fare data quality by class. For each pclass show: passengers_with_fare, passengers_missing_fare, avg_fare_known (actual average, NULLs excluded), and avg_fare_imputed (NULLs replaced with the overall fare average across all classes before computing). The two columns reveal what happens when you impute with the global mean — classes with below-average fares see their averages rise, classes with above-average fares see them fall. Order by pclass ascending.
Solve it in the browser editor →
Runs on SQLite in your browser, graded against the expected result, no signup. A wrong answer gets a diagnosis, not just "incorrect".
Schema
passengers
| passenger_id | survived | pclass | name | sex | age | sibsp | parch | fare | embarked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 3 | Braund, Mr. Owen Harris | male | 22 | 1 | 0 | 7.25 | S |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | Cumings, Mrs. John Bradley | female | 38 | 1 | 0 | 71.28 | C |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | Heikkinen, Miss. Laina | female | 26 | 0 | 0 | 7.93 | S |
Expected output: Per-class fare completeness with raw vs globally-imputed averages
Hint
Concepts
SELECT NULL Handling COALESCE GROUP BY Aggregation CASE Subquery
Practise the topic: SQL practice questions · NULL handling practice · GROUP BY exercises · CASE WHEN practice · CTE practice
In these company practice sets
A SQL Quest challenge matched to patterns reported for these companies — not a question any of them has published.
Related questions
Where would this cost you points in an interview?
Ten questions, no signup: a Skillmap across nine SQL skills and the one to fix first.
Take the readiness test